| >>NLB Resources | |
| Related Articles Related Images Related eBooks All Related Resources | |
Gambling farms in the 19th century
By Chia, Joshua Yeong Jia|Nor-Afidah Abd Rahman written on 2007-01-12
National Library Board Singapore
Comments on article: InfopediaTalk
Early Regulation on Gambling
The inhabitants of Singapore under Raffles were
already engaged in gambling activities. While the
Malays were betting at cock-fighting, the Chinese were the
principal gamblers. Cock-fighting and gambling were
regarded by Sir Stamford Raffles to be the worst vices
and he disapproved them. Raffles'
counterpart, William Farquhar, however saw these
"vices" as opportunities to obtain revenue and
in 1820 issued licences for gambling farms while Raffles was
away. Farquhar sold the licence of the gaming tables for
$95 and a tax was levied on the Captain Chinas who were given
control over the tables.
When Raffles came back to Singapore in 1822,
the differing views of Raffles and Farquhar on gambling
resulted in arguments. Raffles ordered the closure
of all gambling farms and cockpits through the Regulation,
No. IV of 1823, entitled A Regulation prohibiting
gaming-houses and cockpits, and for suppressing the vice of
gaming of Singapore. In that regulation,
he proclaimed that as "the practice of gaming
being highly destructive to the morals and happiness of the
people", the Government would not tolerate under any
circumstances public gaming-house or cockpit, and that
"all persons are strictly prohibited from keeping such on
any terms or pretence whatsoever". The punishment for
flouting this rule was severe; the confiscation of
buildings used for gambling and flogging of gambling farm
operators and gamblers.
Lucrative Gambling Farms
When Farquhar was replaced by John Crawfurd as the British
Resident in 1823, to the delight of gambling den operators and
gamblers, the new Resident supported Farquhar's idea about
gambling farms. In August 1823, Crawfurd
permitted ten gambling houses in town and a cockpit in Kampong
Bugis. By 1826, gambling was the most lucrative tax farm,
contributing to nearly half of the $75,000 tax-farm
revenue.
In 1827, one year after the end of Crawfurd's office, the
Grand Jury demanded the prohibition of gambling, which
he perceived as an immoral nuisance. In 1829,
gambling was banned throughout the Straits
Settlements. But this clamp-down drove gambling
underground and although it became illegal, gambling flourished
after the ban. In 1832, many gambling houses still
existed with at least 20 of them congregating on Church Street
alone.
Despite numerous appeals over the years, the gambling farm was
never restored. In 1834, Resident Councillor Bonham
suggested to re-introduce the gambling farms but it was
not done. In 1838, the press suggested the restoration
of the gambling farm as illegal gambling dens were still
operating blatantly with the connivance of the police. In
1861, there was a shortage of female immigrants and Governor
Orfeur Cavenagh contemplated to legalise gambling in order to
fund an incentive scheme to encourage Chinese to
bring their wives to Singapore. However his idea was not
implemented. Despite the ban on gambling farms, gambling
dens continued to exist. In 1862, the Sheriff had to
convened a public meeting to tackle gambling after key European
residents complained about the police's inaction
toward gambling during the first two weeks of the Chinese
New Year.
Legislation on Gaming Houses
The first legislation against gaming houses in Singapore
appeared to be within the Police Act of 1856.
Subsequently several ordinances followed, in 1870, 1876
and 1879, and finally in 1888 which was still in force at the
end of the 19th century. The ordinances targetted
both the gaming houses and the public
lotteries.
Author
Joshua Chia Yeong Jia & Nor-Afidah Abd Rahman
References
Braddell, R. S. (1911). A commentary on the common gaming
houses ordinance (V of 1888) [Microfilm: NL 5828].
Singapore: Kelly & Walsh.
Buckley, C. B. (1984). An anecdotal history of old
times in Singapore 1819-1867 (pp. 60, 63, 97, 106, 112,
141-144, 149, 156, 240, 229, 317, 330, 366, 447-448, 471, 506,
691, 768). Singapore: Oxford University Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.75 BUC)
Singapore local laws and institutions, 1823 (pp.
10-12) [Microfilm: NL NL7979]. (1824). London: Printed by Cox
and Baylis.
Song, O. S. (1984). One hundred years' history of
the Chinese in Singapore (pp.11, 16-19). Singapore:
Oxford University Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.75 SON)
Turnbull, C. M. (1989). A history of Singapore
1819-1988 (pp. 24, 26, 49). Singapore: Oxford
University Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.75 TUR)
Victor, P. (1940). The old gambling farms: A Chinese
problem in Malaya yesterday and today. The Straits
Times Annual 1940, 81-87 [Microfilm:
NL 7746]. Singapore: Straits Times
Publishing.
Gambling - a history pool. (1998, September 19). The
Straits Times.
Further Readings
Singh, C. (1960). Gaming in
Malaya. Singapore: Malayan Law Journal Ltd.
(Call no.: RCLOS 795.026 CHO)
Dobree, C. T. (1955). Gambling games of
Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: The Caxton Press.
(Call no.: RCLOS 795 DOB)
The information in this article is valid as at 2006 and
correct as far as we are able to ascertain from our
sources. It is not intended to be an exhaustive or
complete history of the subject. Please contact the
Library for further reading materials on the topic.
Subject
Recreation
Gambling--Singapore
Law and government>>Regulatory role>>Gambling
>> 4-D : Singapore’s most popular gambling pastime