| >>NLB Resources | |
| Related Articles Related Images Related eBooks All Related Resources | |
The China Trade
By Nor-Afidah Abd Rahman written on 2003-07-28
National Library Board Singapore
Comments on article: InfopediaTalk
The history of the China trade in
Southeast Asia goes many centuries back, and the ancient term
for it was Nanhai trade. The exchange of goods and ideas
between China and Southeast Asia had already taken place before
the Europeans' arrival in the 16th century. The China trade
and its lucrative returns provided the setting for rulers,
explorers and buccaneers to pit themselves against one another,
or to collude among themselves, to gain dominance and wealth in
the Malay Archipelago.
History
The Nanhai trade and the Malay entrepot
The Nanhai trade was the ancient maritime trade between
China and kingdoms in the Southern Seas (or Nanyang). It
involved ports and markets between Annam and the tip of the
Malay Peninsula. (Wang 2003: 89). The Chinese maritime
exploration of lands to its west opened its eyes to the
possibilities of more direct trade with India, Arab and Rome.
This discovery set the stage for the role that Southeast Asia
would play as facilitator of this trade (Suarez 1999: 45). The
earliest Chinese sailors found the Malay Archipelago a
hindrance to their westbound voyage and sought short cuts
across the Kra Ithmus, north of the Malay Peninsula. The
discovery of the availability of valuable indigenous products
from mainland Southeast Asia inspired them to take the arduous
route around the Peninsula and through the Malacca Strait to
call at the islands' ports. In the late tenth century, a
Sung dynasty official recorded two great emporiums of the
Southern Seas; the kingdoms situated directly to the south of
China had Srivijaya (in Sumatra) while those to the southeast
had She-po (Java) (Suarez 1999: 46). As a result of the
Nanhai trade, Malay maritime kingdoms sprung up, each
sustained by entrepot trade that connected merchants of the
East-West trade between India, China and West Asia. Vessels
plying the India-China route would call at their ports, to
trade and stock up on supplies of firewood, water and food
before continuing their journey to China or India. There were
records alluding to Lo-yueh (possibly Johore) being an
active port in the Nanhai trade and that merchants from
Lo-yueh annually boarded ships destined for Canton. The
Han Court had records of the types of tribute given to the
Chinese emperor - forest and animal products of Southeast Asia,
specifically attributed to the southern part of the Malay
Peninsula and of Sumatra. These served as evidence to the
active trading in the sea routes south of the Malay Peninsula
(Trade and shipping in the Southern seas 1985: 5).
Malay Maritime empires
Srivijaya (or Shi li fo shi in Chinese) was the first
Malay maritime empire, lying astride two strategic waters, the
Malacca and Sunda straits. Between the seventh and the eleventh
centuries, it flourished and almost eclipsed its neighbouring
ports, wielding an influence as far the Kra Ithmus. Srivijaya
sent trade missions to China (Canton) and its traders were
leaders of the foreign merchants community in Canton. Srivijaya
owed its success to its rich hinterland which had products that
were sought by East-West traders. Furthermore, it had brought
the Orang Laut, the notorious wanderers of the sea, under its
control enabling safe shipping in the Straits, free of
piracy.
After the 11th century, Srivijaya faded out from the
Archipelago history, a decline which began from the Cola's
(a South Indian kingdom) attack on the empire. It took another
four centuries before another great Malay empire emerged to
reprise and even surpass the dominance of Srivijaya. Malacca
captured the imagination of not only the Chinese but the
Europeans as well. Malacca's rise was meteoric, bringing
the Malays once again to the forefront of international trade.
Acting as a prime redistribution centre of the fabled spice
trade - cloves, nutmeg and mace - its fame spread to China, the
Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean. Malacca's status was
enhanced by the visit of Chinese envoys in the early 15th
century, and it was given monopoly rights on Chinese goods, a
status that attracted international traders. The Portuguese
quickly saw the potential of the Malacca entrepot and captured
Malacca in 1511.
Nanhai trade routes, merchants and commodities
The monsoons pattern dictated trade movements in the Straits of
Malacca. In January, ships from Southwest China would sail to
Malay islands and then back to China from June to August. Ships
heading for South India would leave the Malay ports in April to
August with the southwest monsoon, or in December with the
northeast monsoon. Thus it was impossible to make the trip from
China to India in one season. Ships made the ports along the
straits their halfway points where they would unload goods and
passengers, stock up on supplies and refill with cargo from the
other end of the route, temporarily stored at the ports
awaiting their arrival. The reversal of the monsoon would carry
them back the other way. (The Encyclopedia of Malaysia 1998:
116).
The players of the Nanhai trade were either direct
traders who sailed from their homeland to the ports bringing
merchandise to trade, or middlemen who collected and traded the
merchandise on behalf of the states which exported the produce.
A cosmopolitan mix of traders sustained the Nanhai
trade. Apart from the local traders whose ships were a familiar
sight on the East-West trade route, the Persians and Arab
traders were active middlemen during Srivijayan times,
supplementing Malay sailors as carriers of international
cargoes between India and China. Their role declined between
the 12th and 13th centuries, due partly to the entry of private
Chinese traders. The Chinese had showed up earlier, between
ninth and tenth centuries, but came in full force after the
Chinese government granted increased freedom to private
merchants to make voyages to Southeast Asia. This tide was
arrested in the 15th century largely due to the changing policy
of the Ming government who forbade Chinese merchants to go
abroad, and kept China trade under state monopoly.
The merchandise traded showed on one hand the strength of
material culture of the Chinese civilisation and on the other
the natural richness of the Archipelago. Bronzeware, pottery,
beads and textiles from China were exchanged for rainforest and
sea products of Southeast Asia -- aromatic woods, resins,
spices and pharmaceuticals.
Description
The Portuguese
The Portuguese paved the way for European manoeuvres in the
China trade. Despite their more advanced organisation, the
Portuguese traders did not reinvent the China trade, rather
imitated their predecessors. They followed the same trade
routes, used the same ports and exchanged the same genre of
products. They first began using the China trade to procure
products for Europe, but what proved more lasting and lucrative
was the regional trade (or country trade) involving Asian
markets and ports.
The Dutch
The Anglo-Dutch rivalry in the eastern seas was already brewing
when the Portuguese was still in control of Malacca. The lure
of the spices - clove, nutmeg and mace- fired Dutch ambition to
create a monopoly of the spice trade, culminating in the
capture of Batavia (in Java) in 1619. Like the Portuguese, the
Dutch treasured the country trade with the Malay islands and
China as this proved more lucrative than the European trade.
The Dutch made no bones about enforcing the exclusive rights of
its company ships to trade and of its entrepot, Batavia, to
receive goods. Not only were the English merchants rattled, the
Chinese junk captains were also rebuffed. The instability of
local politics in the Malay Archipelago facilitated Dutch
control of the region. Local princes would enter into treaties
with the Dutch to offset their rivals often at the exclusion of
alliances with other foreign powers. Such intrigue helped the
Dutch to seize Malacca from the Portuguese in 1641. The capture
of Malacca was important, to strengthen Batavia's position
by removing its rival. By the 18th century, Dutch control of
the country trade with China was almost complete -- they had
controlling rights of the most important export crops, and they
had secured the pepper and tin trade that were strongholds of
islands outside Java. Dutch monopolistic tendencies were so
severe that they were in effect choking the flow of trade and
goods into the Archipelago.
The British
As for the British, the aggressive Dutch in part dampened their
enthusiasm for trade in the Archipelago. The East India Company
E.I.C. established a factory in Bantam, Java, in 1603 but their
staffs were expelled by the Dutch in 1682. The British E.I.C
did not command as much resources, primarily in the number of
country ships as the Dutch V.O.C. to sustain a flourishing
country trade in the Malay waters. It was not until the entry
of British country captains in the 18th century, with blessings
from the E.I.C. and the British government, was the British
able to engage extensively in the country trade. The country
captains were drawn from a varied pool; seamen who had left
European ships with the consent of their employers; servants of
East India companies, resigned or retired from service, who
loved the life of the East; mercenary soldiers with maritime
experience, adventurers of many diverse backgrounds. (Furber
1976: 273). Unlike the Dutch country trade, the British country
trade was moved more by the country's individual traders
rather than E.I.C. ships. The heightened activities of British
country traders provided the stimulus for E.I.C. to explore new
channels of commerce that lay outside the monopoly of other
European powers. In 1761, an employee of the British E.I.C.,
Alexander Dalrymple, took a ship out in the eastern waters, the
first British vessel to seriously reconnoitre the region, and
set up a trading venture in Sulu and a settlement in
Balambangan. Although not a commercial success, this effort
pointed the way to the later settlements at Penang, Singapore
and Borneo.
Author
Nor-Afidah Abd Rahman
References
Chee, A., & Buerger, D. (2001). (Eds.). The
encyclopedia of Malaysia (Vol. 6, pp. 10-11). Singapore:
Archipelago Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.5003 ENC)
Fell, R. T. (1991). Early maps of South-East Asia.
Singapore : Oxford University Press.
(Call no.: RSING 912.59 FEL).
Fry, H. T. (1970). Alexander Dalrymple (1737-1808) and
the expansion of British trade. London : Cass for the
Royal Commonwealth Society.
(Call no.: RCLOS 382.0942 DAL.F)
Furber, H. (c1976). Rival empires of trade in the Orient,
1600-1800. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota
Press.
(Call no.: RSING 382.09405 FUR).
Lyons, K., & Sarwal, A. (Eds.). ( c2001). The
encyclopedia of Malaysia (Vol. 7, pp. 14-15). Singapore:
Archipelago Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.5003 ENC)
Moore, Wendy (Khatijah). (Ed.). (c1998). The encyclopedia
of Malaysia (Vol. 4, pp. 115-123). Singapore: Archipelago
Press.
(Call no.: RSING 959.5003 ENC)
Suárez, T. (c1999). Early mapping of Southeast
Asia. Hong Kong: Periplus Editions.
(Call no.: SING q912.59 SUA).
Trade and shipping in the Southern seas : selected readings.
(1985). In Archipel 18 for SPAFA Consultative
Workshop on Research on Maritime Shipping and Trade Networks in
Southeast Asia. Bangkok: SPAFA Co-ordinating Unit.
(Call no.: RSING q387.50959 TRA)
Wang, G. (2003). The Nanhai trade: early Chinese trade in
the South China Sea. Singapore : Eastern Universities
Press.
(Call no.: R 382.0951059 WAN)
The American Spice Trade Association. (n.d.). Wars and new
spice monopolies. Retreived August 7, 2003, from www.astaspice.org/history/history_05.htm
Further Readings
Ishii, Y. (Ed.). (1998). The junk trade of Southeast Asia:
translations from the Tôsen Fusetsu-gaki, 1674-1723.
Singapore: [Canberra] : Institute of Southeast Asian
Studies.
(Call no.: RSING 382.0959 TOS)
Mills, L. A. [1971]. British Malaya, 1824-1867 (pp.
1-17). [New York: AMS Press].
(Call no.: RCLOS 959.5 MIL)
The information in this article is valid as at 2003 and correct as far as we are able to ascertain from our sources. It is not intended to be an exhaustive or complete history of the subject. Please contact the Library for further reading materials on the topic.
Subject
Commerce and Industry>>Trade
Singapore-- Commerce--China
Business, finance and industry>>Business organization>>Business enterprises
>> Orang Laut
All Rights Reserved. National Library Board Singapore 2004.